open twenty four hours

. . . because that's when i'm up.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

The Barbie Incident

I am told I was a pain in the neck as a baby. I, for some reason, thought 9 P.M. was a perfectly acceptable time to wake up and play. For hours. And, if mom and dad weren’t willing to go along with my night-owl tactics, I would scream from my crib. When the choice between A.M. and P.M. Kindergarten presented itself, it was pretty obvious which group I belonged in.
My brother, Brian, is twenty-two months younger than me, but he was widely regarded as the angel baby of the family. He ate and he slept (when he was supposed to). He didn’t cry or fuss.

Luckily, I came first, and my parents didn’t know any better.


When I was eleven years old, my mother led me downstairs to our dimly lit basement, which had recently become a large storage unit (housing all the Christmas decorations that wouldn’t quite fit in the crawlspace, and all the childhood toys my brother and I insisted we were too old to play with) telling me she had to show me something. She wouldn’t tell me what it was, even though I begged repeatedly, almost annoyingly. I thought she had gotten me a present, and she didn’t want my brother to see her give it to me. We had barely walked in the front door after coming home from school. I sashayed through the basement in my plaid, catholic schoolgirl jumper and saddle shoes as she brought me across the mold brown carpet and through the maze of boxes sharpied in my dad’s unmistakable scrawl: “ORNAMENTS,” “ANNALEES,” “BOARD GAMES,” and (more) “ORNAMENTS.” I never understood why he always wrote in all capital letters. I also never understood why, even though we had more than enough ornaments to cover the Christmas tree, he continued to buy new ones every year. Eventually, we reached the opposite end of the basement, near the escape hatch window, and stopped in front of a dresser that had become the new home for my barbies, since I had recently become both too old and too cool to play with them.

But there they were. Dozens of small, tanned bodies, dismembered. The appendages lay jammed into two dresser drawers. Their blond, decapitated heads and beady blue eyes, still wide open, looked up at me in their typical naivety, unconcerned (or, obviously, unaware) about the absence of their arms and legs, lacking curiosity about the disappearance of their breasts, unembarrassed by their uncharacteristic nakedness. I pulled one, then two, then three heads out of the drawers by strands of braided, pony-tailed, or knotted hair and examined their broken necks. The heads had not been simply popped off, clean, quick and easy, but severed, perhaps cracked, unevenly, with no chance of reattachment. The midsections sounded like baby rattles, small pieces of their leftover necks dropped into their stomachs, knocking up against always empty body cavities. Perfectly sculpted legs, never plagued by cellulite, were rendered un-walkable, bent backward in 45-degree angles at the knees. Arms that once waved happily from stylish sports cars, adorned with clinking, decorative, silver bangle bracelets and hands that once proudly locked with those of her boyfriend (or was he her husband?), or kid sister, would never experience these social delicacies again.

Moments later, I found shreds of clothing, bits of lace and cotton poly-blend, in various shades of pink, covering the bottom of each drawer like bedding in a hamster cage. Miniature patent leather handbags were missing their handles, and stilettos were, all of a sudden, arched flats.

Bright pink collector’s edition boxes that had, previously, remained unopened were torn open at the tops like cereal boxes, the clear plastic on the display windows slashed open with a child-proof scissors.

The cars and homes, however, remained untouched.

The look on my mother’s face asked if I had been the one responsible for the massacre. After all, it wouldn’t have been the first (and certainly wouldn’t be the last) time I had attempted to hide some kind of character damaging evidence from my parents. When I was eight years old, I hid a multiplication math test in my underwear drawer beneath neatly folded piles of bikini-cut jockeys. I had miserably failed the test, and I was required to get one of my parents to sign it. Rather than bring my failure to my parents’ attention, I hid it, in hopes that it would disappear on its own. But my avoidant, scheming eight-year-old mind forgot that Mom not only did all my laundry, but also put it away in my dressers for me. I’m sure my cover-up only lasted for a couple days, until Mom sat me down with the test and I made, at last, a tear-filled confession: guilty.

But this time, she didn’t say anything. She just stood by, watching me pilfer through the wreckage searching for survivors. Eventually, my face flushed and I slammed the dresser drawers and ran through the maze of Christmas boxes and dashed up the stairs and went screaming through the house looking for Brian.


We didn’t have family dinnertime very often at my house. I don’t say this to evoke any kind of sympathy, or to insinuate that my parents didn’t think that family time was important. Brian and I were just very involved in our activities. He spent five out of seven nights a week playing hockey, and I spent the same amount of time at my dance studio. Dad acted as Brian’s chauffer, and Mom was mine. Suffice it to say we collected a lot of McDonald’s happy meal toys along the way. I think my parents still have them, boxed up in the basement or attic somewhere.

But before my parents packed them away, Brian and I bartered with them. We created a game called “Pass it Under.” The rules of the game were simple. We closed the door to my bedroom. I sat behind the door inside my room, and Brian sat in the hallway. We’d empty out our bottomless junk drawers filled with happy meal toys, prizes for a job well done from our grade school principal, junk we had won at the indoor carnival at Church, and each create a pile of stuff to “trade.” Certainly, it would have been too simple for us to sit side-by-side elsewhere in the house and trade, the way little boys trade baseball cards, or the way children swap snacks in the lunchroom. There was something more fun, more surprising about sliding treasures through the crack between the bottom of the door and the top of the brown, fuzzy carpet.

Brian would start by stuffing a small trinket or toy under my bedroom door, and I would pick it up, examine it closely, and select a trinket from my give-away pile to respond with. If this process took too long (in Brian’s estimation) he would clear his throat and announce, as if addressing an audience, “Pass it Under!” We would continue on in this fashion, until Brian would start trying to give me the same junk I had rejected for trade the last time we played. Sometimes he would respond by opening my door and tossing the toys inside, other times we would jam our fingers from pushing at the same object in opposite directions at the same time. It never occurred to us to throw the cheap, plastic toys that we didn’t want in the garbage, instead of trying to pawn them off on each other.

And wouldn't you know, I have grown to be a woman who avoids conflict at all costs. I don’t like confrontation. At parties, I shrink out of the room when people get into an argument. I don’t even particularly like serious face-to-face conversations. When asked a question I feel uncomfortable answering, I become increasingly interested in the patterns of the tiles on the floor, the cracks in the ceiling, or the clothing of pedestrians on the sidewalk. I make a funny comment. I notice that it’s starting to rain, or snow, or that the sun is coming out. I do everything but answer directly. I swear by my caller-ID, and most of my incoming calls go straight to voice mail. My preferred mode of communication is e-mail. I enjoy the immediacy of text messaging and instant messaging. I do everything possible to avoiding seeing or hearing an in-the-moment kind of reaction. I’ve been told, on more than one occasion, that I’m emotionally closed off, and I’m only verbally straightforward after a glass of wine, or two, or whatever it takes to break down the walls. I'm (still) hiding.


When I finally found Brian, he was sitting quietly on his beanbag chair in his bedroom playing Gameboy in the dark. My face was hot, red, and stinging from the tears rolling down my cheeks. I flicked on the light.

A few minutes later, our mother was standing behind me in Brian’s doorframe. Very few words managed to escape from my mouth. I was too upset and angry to form complete sentences. It was a preview into the future, and proof of how difficult it would be for me to communicate directly later in life, even though I didn’t realize it at the time. But I do remember throwing a mangled Barbie leg at him in my fury.

“How could you do this?!”

“I don’t know,” he said. But he didn’t attempt to deny it, and there was really nothing else for him to say.

“Some of those were collector dolls!” I stomped forward, but mom grabbed me by the hand before I got much further. I was shrieking, sobbing, and thrashing my arms back and forth. “I could have passed them along to my own daughter someday! And you, you just destroyed them!”

It couldn’t have been the fact that I might someday have a daughter and might someday pass along my doll collection to her that made me so upset. Perhaps it was, I imagine, my brother’s single-handed destruction of an aspect of my childhood through an attack on my dolls.


Years later, after Brian and I had gone away to college and moved to different states, we only saw each other for select holidays, obligatory trips home for Christmas, Thanksgiving, and Easter. From time to time, on car trips, traveling to visit family, I bring up the “Barbie Incident.”

I still ask him what provoked him to destroy my Barbies the way he did, hoping 14 years has been enough time for him to finally let it out. He still won’t answer. He says he doesn’t remember. He says I must have done something to one of his things, maybe even accidentally. He says he was nine, and it was a long time ago. He jams his iPod ear buds back in his ears and looks out the window, responding to numerous text messages as they come in.
Brian lets all of my calls go to voice mail, and (sometimes) calls me back after he listens to the message. But we do e-mail. And these days, both of us stay up all night.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

i've always been the kind of girl that loves re-runs. . .

so, it’s been awhile.

i debated whether i should just delete all my old postings and start fresh (open 24 hours under new management, i suppose). perhaps i still will. but, re-reading them, they made me laugh (at least a little bit). so, for now, they stay.

(i’ve always been one for nostalgia, anyway).

at any rate, here’s the short version:

i am, of course, still in chicago. still in the apartment i moved into nearly 3 years ago. still in lincoln park. still loving (almost) every minute of it. i thought about moving when my lease renewal came up this year, then quickly came to the realization that i have an abnormally large closet (lucky find), and it would be nearly impossible to replace.

i no longer work at banana republic, though i still work in retail on michigan avenue. i’ve finally decided that this is ok (for now).

i went back to school. i completed a Master’s Degree this spring. i probably won’t use it in my professional life. i’ve decided that this is also ok.

i broke down and got a MacBook and an iPod about two years ago. i take both almost everywhere i go. i haven’t looked back.

i still read, drink (vodka and coffee -- but not together), and shop more than is probably healthy.

as far as the people i always wrote about:

my fav. girl to blog about, and best friend (karen), no longer lives in chicago (so we therefore no longer make long lists of bar songs on business cards (and other similar bar time antics) . . . at least not on as regular a basis as we used to). she is, hopefully not for much longer, in colorado with matt (who will probably go back to making mean comments on my blog once he discovers i’ve started writing again). she still teaches special ed.

i’m still friends with josh, however we did have several “friend break-ups” between then and now. i’m happy to report that we’re currently on-again (which is probably why i’ve returned to blogging). we still live a few blocks away from each other. he started his own web-design business almost a year ago. he has quit bartending, he says, for good. cheers to that.

bill and i are no longer bill and i, and haven’t been for quite some time. he works in publishing, yet he still doesn’t read (he does, however, understand how unfair this is). we see each other around the neighborhood from time to time, and i’m happy to report that we don’t run in the opposite direction.

there are, of course, new people, new stories, new readings, new outrages.

stay tuned.

xo,

kellieannie

Friday, October 28, 2005

Suxtober

much to the chagrin of this bonafide northsider and diehard cubs fan, the white sox have won the world series. while i have pouted around my apartment for a few days, the white sox victory has ultimately given me pause to be wary of some cubs fans, too.

a few comments about this unfortunate series of events:

while an admittedly dramatic correlation, i can't help but compare this overnight white sox fan phenomenon to the rapid influx, then decline, of patriotism after 9/11. in the weeks of the aftermath of the worst attack on u.s. soil, americans everywhere dug old glory out of the closet where it had been collecting dust since god only knows when and hung it proudly on their porches, automobiles, and from their apartment windows. retail stores sold t-shirts displaying flags, and pertinant quotations from respected (?) past national leaders, then donated part of the profits to help the cause. fast food chains, gas stations, and flower shops, instead of advertising the weekly specials or hours of operation, posted "God Bless America" and "United We Stand" on their marquees. bumper stickers stating similar sentiments were readily available in junk stores, and at least every third car on the road, be it a bmw or pickup truck, had one of these messages displayed askew on its rear windows/doors/etc. and then, a few months later, the flags slowly came down, specials reappeared on marquees, and t-shirts were donated to good will or packed to lay in wait until the fourth of july. the bumper stickers remained, though i believe that was more laziness than anything else -- too much effort to scrape the thing off.

while the city-wide argument is that this is good for the city of chicago, and we should have all been cheering for "the chicago team," i couldn't help but cheer for the astros. i also couldn't help but wear my d.lee cubs t-shirt out last saturday night. in fact, i remember quite distinctly a few years back, as the cubs were in the playoffs, the southside refrained from showing any support in the general north-side direction. now, as i walk around my neighborhood, i can't help but shake my head: the 7-11 on the corner of n.clark and wrightwood is selling white sox cookies. tarascas has a computer generated photograph of a margarita with a white sox emblem seemingly "floating" inside it. on the L platforms fancy enough to have digital transit information marquees, along with the time, date, and estimated arrival of the next train, have "Go Sox!" added to the mix. alleged cubs fans have, all of sudden, donned white sox t-shirts and caps. i could go on, and on, and on. . .

i'm trying to figure out where this fandom has suddenly come from, and why. why certain events cause people to bandwagon jump and claim something they have no right to: whether it be fandom, or patriotism. if you're only going to support a team or a country or any other institution only when it feels like it's popular or appropriate to do so, in my opinion, don't bother.

don't get me wrong, certainly, the sox do deserve their congratulations, their parade, and their grant park celebration for a job well done. i just didn't really expect anyone to show up. because, just as surely, we all observed throughout the duration of the regular season, that the white sox, while undisputably the team with the best record in baseball, continued to fail to sell out u.s. cellular field.

similarly, i will admit to paying well over face value for cubs tickets on ebay even as the season began to wind down and the cubs chances at a post-season were beyond dismal. just as i have sworn and cursed at the box offices for the past few seasons because i was unable to swing out to wrigley on a whim to take in a game. so what draws the crowds? is it the neighborhoods? is it the tradition? is it the idea we have about what cubs fans or sox fans are supposed to be like, and choose the group we would like to see ourselves as part of accordingly? many of us, too, will argue we were raised cheering for a certain team, and that is the team we stand by today.

it's easy to pick out the bandwagon jumpers, too. afterall, if you were a true white sox fan, i would expect your black shirt to be faded from wash and wear; i would expect the brim on your cap to be bent well into shape. but those of you who have smuggly meandered to strange cargo and purchased a shiny new cap and t-shirt. . . i can pick you out as clear as day as you're walking down the street. you are only fooling yourself, and next season, more than likely, you will donate those items to goodwill, and pull out your own faded and worn baseball attire: primarily it will be blue and red.

but, now you've found yourself in quite the debacle: you aren't a cubs fan because you love cubs baseball. you're a cubs fan because you think being a cubs fan is the "popular thing" to be. and, if there's anything i can't stand more than all-so-sudden white sox fans, it's cubs "fans" that force me to attend half as many games at twice the price.

my point, and i do have one, is this: be loyal. pick a team, and stick with them, unwaveringly. if you're going to be a cubs fan, be a diehard cubs fan. same goes for sox fans. and patriotism.

xo,

kellieannie

Friday, August 19, 2005

it's 3 a.m., do you know where your Baudelaire is?

apparently, it's sitting in a vending machine in one of five Parisian locations, accessible 24 hours a day.

i'm sure you can imagine my shock (that the brilliant city of chicago didn't think of this first) and delight (that someone was brilliant enough to come up with the idea in the first place) upon discovering this book-vending-machine phenomenon.

sure, we have our 24 hour online browsing options available to us courtesy of amazon.com. but browsing is by no means the same as having. Parisians no longer have to wait until 10 a.m. for the bookshops to open. if they want a new novel at 3 a.m., it's theirs; instant gratification to a whole new level (which, i would imagine, is well suited for our american way of living).

it's almost enough to make me want to learn french, then move across an ocean. . . but, if nothing else, i suppose i could just track down Mayor Daley and insist chicago follow suit.

to that end, i recommend the inagural chicago book vending machines be placed by the 24-hour starbucks at north and wells, and the fullerton L stop. i might also suggest a machine for titles on the new york times' bestsellers list, as well as a machine for classic titles. . . perhaps even a machine devoted to children's books (see, it's a cure for stunted literacy rates, too!).

not to mention, reading is a much better way to spend your transit time than re-categorizing the songs on your ipod. *ahem*

xo,

kellieannie

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

honey, please (don't) act your age

this weekend, on the bus to alpine for the dave show. . .

preface: there were many scantilly clad drunk girls present, making spectacles of themselves and creating dramatic situations with fellow bus go-ers . . .

at a particularly dramatic moment, i turned to bill and the following conversation ensued:

kel: "who do these girls think they are? and furthmore, who taught them it was okay to dress that way and act that way?"
bill: "well, they think that's the best way to get attention. and, you have to remember, a lot of people on the bus are just out of college, you know. 21, 22. they're just not quite mature enough yet to . . . "

bill apparently had a momentary lapse regarding my recent college graduation and my 3 and a half years younger than him age.

kel: "um, bill? have you forgotten who you're talking to?"
bill: (the pr junkie in him pauses to brainstorm some damage control): "see, that just shows that i think of you as the same age"
kel: "uh huh. . . stop talking"

i am, apparently, a (nearly) 26 year old trapped in a 22 year old's body. . .

xo,

kellieannie

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

laziness on your own terms

last night, the great city of chicago showed "annie hall" at Butler Field in Grant Park. karen and i attended.

there's an ampitheatre directly behind the field, and the city of chicago provides white plastic chair seating for this ampitheatre. as a direct result, many movie goers were dragging these ampitheatre chairs (joined in groups of three) closer to the movie viewing area. security didn't like this idea, and went around to all the white chair sitters asking them to move the chairs back to where they found them. . . they "weren't allowed to be moved." of course, a woman sitting behind karen and i would not comply.

and here, the recreation of my re-telling the situation to josh:

kel: chair sitter: "fine. but you're going to have to help me move them"
security guy: "well ma'am, you seem to have managed to move it over here by yourself"
chair sitter: "fine. i'll move them. . . when the movie is over"
security guy: "no, ma'am, i'm sorry, you're going to have to move now. people behind you can't see."
chair sitter: well, i'm just trying to have a nice relaxing evening and watch the movie"

josh: I don't get people like that

kel: security guy: "well, you can relax on the chairs back where you got them from"
chair sitter: "but i can't move them. . . they're too heavy. you'll have to help me"

kel (again, but this time only as kel): this exchange repetitiously went on for seriously 10-12 minutes . . . karen was like. . . "is she on something?"

josh: see, that'd be a funny blog
kel: i know . . . i'm writing it now
josh: ...lol

eventually, the woman left. leaving the chairs in the middle of the grass, unattended. interestingly enough, the security guy didn't come back to move the chairs either. . . i'm assuming it would have required too much effort for him to get out of his golf-cart like mobile.

some people. . .

*sigh*

xo,

kellieannie

Monday, July 18, 2005

No John Kerry = No Flip Flops

to: the northwestern women's lacrosse team
re: white house flip-flop incident
from: a concerned, well-educated, fashionable, chicago-area woman.

ladies,

i don't even know where to begin. but really, honestly, the question must be reiterated. . . why did you wear flip-flops and sandals to the white house?! why?! seriously, how could you?

keeping in mind that you attend one of the most reputable universities in the nation (near a fairly fashionable city!) makes this even more confusing to me. you are obviously intelligent women--how could this have happened? you look like you were about ready to attend a garden party or a barbeque. would you go to a job interview on michigan avenue wearing flip-flops and no pantyhose? no. no you certainly wouldn't. and if you did, you certainly would not be hearing back from the company in question. despite my disdain for conventional formalities, i still believe certain decorum and dress are required for specific occasions. i imagine a visit to the white house ought to be a few steps up from job interviews on the formality scale, but apparently someone forgot to drop this memo into your locker room. i would even have been reluctant to get so liberal as to wear a closed toe, sling-back pump.

i can recommend two books for further reading on the topic. please consult them next time. . . before you step out of your home wearing what you deem to be "acceptable" attire:

What Not to Wear by Trinny Woodall and Susannah Constantine
What Not to Wear For Every Occasion by Trinny Woodall and Susannah Constantine

while some reporters have been attempting to cut you some slack by claiming that the flip-flop is becomming more acceptable in certain situations. . . i believe they are just bullshitting you. or, being paid off by northwestern trustees and contributors in order to hide this media disaster.

i must say, there have been nights that i have looked classier in my bar attire.

xo,

kellieannie